Where the questions come from

The rules every question is written to

1. 01Write ORIGINAL questions from the published exam guide and the provider’s public documentation. Never reproduce, paraphrase or reconstruct a question from a real exam.
2. 02Exactly one defensible answer (or, for multiple-response, exactly one defensible SET). If two options could be argued, the stem is missing a constraint — add the constraint.
3. 03Every distractor must be the answer somebody would give for a specific, nameable reason. No filler, no obviously wrong option, no joke options.
4. 04Every option needs its own rationale, the correct one included.
5. 05Cite documentation the candidate can go and read. Provider documentation only — never a blog, never a forum, never another preparation site.
6. 06Test judgement, not trivia. No questions about pricing figures, service limits that change, or console menu positions.
7. 07British English. Metric units. No trademarked marketing language.

These are not marketing copy. They are the literal instructions in the generation prompt and the checklist the review scores against — one document, read by the model, by the reviewer and by whoever is writing by hand.

From blueprint to published

1. 01Import the blueprintA human reads the provider’s own exam guide and records the domains, the weightings exactly as published, the question count, the time and the passing standard — with the URL and the date. Anything the provider does not publish is left blank.
2. 02Write against the objectivesQuestions are written for one domain and one topic at a time, with the existing bank in front of the author so the same scenario is not written twice.
3. 03Screen for duplicatesBefore anything is stored, every candidate question is compared against the bank and against the rest of its own batch. Near-duplicates are discarded rather than reviewed.
4. 04Automated technical reviewA second, stronger model scores the question on seven axes and returns a verdict and flags. It cannot publish anything.
5. 05Human reviewA person reads it, edits it or rejects it. Questions carrying a blocking flag — a factual error, two correct answers, a suspected brain dump — cannot be published at all until they are fixed.
6. 06PublishOnly then does it reach a candidate. Editing a published question writes a revision, bumps its version and sends it back for review.

What the review checks

Accuracy and ambiguity count double in the overall score, because those are the two where being wrong costs a candidate a mark on an exam they paid for. The others cost them a slightly worse explanation.

What an explanation looks like

Being told the answer is B teaches you nothing about why you picked C. Every option carries its own reasoning, and the one you chose is pulled to the top.

Questions people ask